Sustainability Trade-offs in the Netherlands’ Entangled Modernisation (STONEM), 1900-2020
The Netherlands has Europe´s worst performance in foreign sustainability trade-offs to least developed countries. The huge Dutch imports of raw materials and goods have had profound consequences for economic, social, and ecological developments elsewhere on the planet. These trade-offs have historical origins. From the nineteenth century onwards, scientific knowledge, colonial developments and industrial modernization contributed to the development of transnational production chains. These connected the Netherlands with the rest of the world. This historical study analyses the developments in edible oils and metals, thus providing perspectives for contemporary initiatives in protein and energy transitions.
The STONEM project in short
Imports of resources affect economic, social, and environmental conditions elsewhere in the world. Regarding sustainability trade-offs abroad, the Netherlands currently has the worst track record in Europe. Its performance has historical origins: over the past two centuries, scientific knowledge production, colonial developments, and industrial modernization have helped to create global production chains. Systematic science-based commodification attributed economic and use values to natural resources. This changed western perceptions of the natural environment. It had a severe impact on global environment and indigenous people’s livelihoods. STONEM investigates this commodification process in conjunction with the development of global supply chains and their effect on sustainability. It traces the activities of global supply chain entanglers, the actors who constructed transnational socioeconomic systems.
The STONEM project consists of different work packages
- Work package 1 performs a quantitative analysis of the historical development of Dutch imports and its sustainability trade-offs. Therefore, it develops two databases: (1) on the import of commodities to the Netherlands, and (2) on the sustainability indicators for selected periods and regions This first woks package is conducted in collaboration with Netherlands Statistics CBS. This work package is part of Postdoc research at Eindhoven University of Technology.
- Work package 2 and 3 qualitatively study the historical developments in supply chains of edible oils and metals. This focusses on the processes of commodification, global system entanglement, and the distribution of sustainability trade-offs. These work packages are PhD research at Eindhoven University of Technology (edible oils) and Utrecht University (metals).
The qualitative research and the case studies enable system comparisons and analysis of cross-system dynamics. This will inform nascent academic fields of sustainability histories and deep transitions. Furthermore, this research will provide perspectives for contemporary policy initiatives in the field of sustainability transitions. The project is supported by an experienced multi-disciplinary team of scholars at Eindhoven, Utrecht and Wageningen university and relevant societal partners, ensuring broad dissemination of the knowledge in academic and policy domains.
Vacancies:
Click on the vacancy of your interest to view the full text.
- PhD position 1: Edible oils
- PhD position 2: Metals
- Postdoc position (t.b.a.)
Research idea and research question
Sustainable developments are seen as the intersection of economic, social, and environmental developments that affect present needs, future options, lives, and livelihoods around the world. These have been operationalized by the United Nations in 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). The Netherlands currently performs well when it comes to sustainability, however, regarding spillover i.e., the sustainability costs that countries impose on one another, its performance is the worst of all European states (Lafortune et al., 2021, 130). Why is this the case?
To investigate, the project Sustainability Trade-offs in the Netherlands’ Entangled Modernization (STONEM) proposes deeper historical research into the developments of the institutional structures of transnational sustainability interrelations. Contemporary European policies on supply chain traceability as part of corporate due diligence and accountability frameworks (Wolters, 2020) make businesses responsible for investigating the social and environmental impacts of their supply chains, implicitly connecting European lifestyles and consumption patterns with sustainable development issues in other parts of the world. These are long terms developments and STONEM suggests studying these from an historical perspective.
Understanding European modernization and Dutch sustainability history requires considering the global connections and demand for foreign resources. Between 1850 and 2020, the Dutch nation’s dependence on imports increased from 13 to 59 percent (Lintsen et al., 2018). The present-day lower scores in spillover of the Netherlands and Europe in general seem rooted in the economic structures and institutions developed during the modernization of society since the mid-19th century. The economic global structures and institutions are constructed by actors. These have shaped transcontinental trade, the exchange of knowledge, and ideologies. They have also created transnational socio-technical systems of resource extraction, production, and consumption, and the associated institutional and behavioral rules (Geels, 2004). Western ideas of economic progress based on scientific insights encouraged a new interpretation of the natural environment. New methods of science-based commodification evolved, describing natural resources in western terms of material characteristics and economic values (Topik and Wells, 2014). Together with global exploration, these methods opened up novel ideas for resource application and often moved resource extraction to places outside the Netherlands. Traders, businesses, colonial authorities, and diplomats acted as global system entanglers. They co-constructed global production chains and were at the locus of where problems and solutions were articulated, dealing with deviating rules, viewpoints, critiques, alternatives, opponents, conflicts, and failures. These confrontations resulted in sustainability trade-offs.
The two main research questions are: how did modern science-based commodification of natural resources contribute to the emergence of industrial global resource supply chains, and what sustainability trade-offs did this process generate between the Netherlands and global South regions? The project additionally aims to connect these long-term historical developments with contemporary challenges in sustainable development policies. STONEM investigates the historical commodity shifts in exports from the global South. To explain these shifts, it scrutinizes two cases: edible oils and minerals. These primary sector natural resources became materials for interconnected systems such as agri-food, metal, and construction industries, transforming the products for a diverse array of markets. Both commodities have played an important role in Dutch modernization through a strong high tech agri-food sector as well as the expansion of infrastructure and the built environment. These same commodities are also currently at the core of initiatives in food pattern transitions and renewable energy production. Historical knowledge is crucial for understanding the complex transnational socio-technical setup, to grasp its processes of change and identify options for transition.
Research concepts
STONEM studies three interconnected issues. First it aims to understand the commodification process i.e., the development of science and technologies that socially (re)constructed the natural environment in terms of technical characteristics and economic values. The second issue is to trace the mainly western actors in their socio-technical construction of globally entangled supply chains. The third element is to study how these systems produced sustainability effects and trade-offs, in global South regions and in the Netherlands. With these tripartite aims, STONEM engages and contributes to various historical debates.
Commodification is seen as the social construction of economic and use values to natural resources. Natural resources become commodities when humans define them as valuable, and what is valuable is highly dependent on the political, economic, social, and cultural context (Zimmerman 1951, Bridge 2009). Historians of consumer culture highlight the long global histories of commodification of products and goods (e.g. Trentmann 2009). Anthropologists and historians show that commodification processes are dynamic, where commodities are constantly being reassessed in broader societal contexts and culturally diverse settings. They furthermore point out that these commodities are not unique to global North modernization (e.g. Van Binsbergen and Geschiere, 2005). Whereas their studies focus on products or ´things,´ the STONEM project emphasizes the science-based commodification of ´stuff,´ how western science and technology systematically attributed chemical and physical characteristics to substances (Homburg et al., 2010, Homburg, 2018). This changed western perceptions of nature and had a severe impact on global environments. STONEM therefore also connects to global histories of resources and environmental histories (see Veraart et al., 2020a; Heymann et al., 2020; Beckert, 2014; Robins 2021). These study the sociotechnical development of resource extraction and application—the culturally entrenched and changing understanding of resources, also in light of transitions towards sustainability (Hecht, 2012, Narins 2017, Vikstöm, 2020). By focusing on economic, social, and environmental trade-offs in supply chain developments, STONEM adds an explicit operationalization of sustainability to this literature.
Global resource chains entangled the Global North and Global South across and beyond colonial structures. To explain the development of global supply chains, STONEM builds upon notions in the History of Technology and Business History that study the role of actors. To investigate the dynamics, it draws on the transnational turn in infrastructure history and Large Technical Systems (LTS) studies of the past decade. These studies analyze the multi-actor processes where priorities, meanings, power relations, and contestations are negotiated and inscribed in the construction of large-scale transnational infrastructures for resource circulation (Van der Vleuten 2008, 2019a). STONEM focusses on selected actors and we call them global system entanglers. These were businesses, (colonial) authorities, diplomats, knowledge institutes, financers, and others, who built or governed the entanglement systems between the Dutch economy and regions elsewhere.
With its explicit focus on sustainability, STONEM engages in the dialogue between sustainability studies and global or transnational history investigating the historical interconnectedness of societies (Iriye 2013; Saunier 2013). It provides sustainability studies with a long-term perspective on global tele-couplings, their entanglements, and their localized implications (Costanza et al. 2007; Trischler 2016; Van der Vleuten 2019b, 2020). STONEM creates a global interpretive framework for (un)sustainable development that captures sustainability entanglements across the global South-North divide. An historical, statistical analysis of Dutch trade in raw materials from 1900 to the present investigates the transnational and geographical origins of raw material flows and their importance for the Dutch economy. This collated data can shed light on the rise, decline, and shifts in specific commodity flows. To assess sustainability in the Netherlands and other countries, the project quantitatively analyses the sustainability modeling applied by the Dutch government, the World Bank and the OECD (World Bank 2011; CBS 2021). In its qualitative historical accounts, STONEM applies dominant western concepts and attributes, to assess historical trends, scales, and impacts. The limitations of this contemporary and mainly western interpretation of sustainability and the impact on qualitative approaches are acknowledged. The project does not see the human-nature divide as pre-given but views it as the outcome of dominant western knowledge production processes that shaped these conceptualizations, understandings, categorizations, behavior and treatment of the environment. Analyzing and understanding the friction, conflicts, and negotiations that shaped global supply chain developments in non-western environments can shed light on alternative indigenous conceptualizations (for a discussion see Hazareesingh & Maat, 2016 and ´The Soy Story´ Project). In conjunction with scholars of The Soy Story project STONEM scholars will problematizes and critically reviews these issues in the qualitative analyses of edible oils and metals.
Methods
The main research questions are how did modern scientific commodification of natural resources contribute to the emergence of industrial global resources supply chains, and what sustainability trade-offs did this process generate between the Netherlands and global South regions? These are operationalized in three elements: (1) the process of commodification of natural resources, (2) the formation, materialization, and development of global trade routes by global system entanglers, and (3) an analysis of trade-offs in entangled regions.
Three work packages (WP) investigate these three elements with a mixed methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative analytical frameworks. STONEM investigates supply chain developments from a macro level in WP1, and in more detail edible oils (WP2) and metals (WP3) supply chains. A fourth work package (WP4) synthesizes these insights and develops policy recommendations (see figure 1).
Commodification
STONEM will study in detail scientific commodification in the supply chain developments for edible oils and metals. These investigations can explain the construction of commodities in terms of material characteristics, typologies, and norms. They will allow further investigation into the historical development of the Netherlands’ global entanglements from a macro perspective. Using a quantitative approach, WP1 will examine the trends in imports and domestic production of natural resources. These investigations can reveal the magnitude of resource flows, periods of rise and decline, competition between and substitution of resources that created shifts in resource application. WP1 places the qualitatively investigated developments of WP2 and WP3 in a broader context.
Global system entanglers
The quantitative patterns found in WP1 cannot stand alone; they require qualitative interpretation, explanation, validation, and possibly correction. The STONEM project’s second focal topic is the activities of global system entanglers beyond Dutch borders in relation to commodification. These are studied qualitatively in WP2 and WP3. In both work packages, the sites of investigation are research departments, knowledge institutes, and businesses, together with advisors on international trade and Dutch diplomatic service investments, (colonial) banks, and other economic consultancies. Studying their activities will shed light on how actors shaped sustainability in the places they entangled in the resource supply chains. Records of these actors can reveal the challenges they faced in the global entanglement process. Specific attention will be paid to the counter forces of indigenous people, alternative conceptualizations, the co-constructions and adaptations in foreign environments.
Trade-offs
The third aim for STONEM is to assess the Trade-offs in economic, social, and environmental aspects during the establishment of global supply chains through commodification and the activities of global system entanglers. Both case studies will study specific entangled regions. This will inform a quantitative sustainability assessment tool to construct an historical time series of sustainability developments in the first work package. Works on sustainability history have used the notion of ‘trade-offs’ to investigate how economic, social, and environmental sustainability gains and losses were historically traded against each other within regional, national, and transnational boundaries (Lintsen et al. 2018, Veraart et al., 2020b). Their findings offer an analysis of the long-term sustainability trade-offs between the global North and South for both case studies. They show how gains and costs were historically traded across time and space. The case of edible oils (WP1) will demonstrate the effects on intra-regional and cross sectoral sustainability trade-offs. For metals, WP2 specifically focuses on the interrelationship between domestic and international trade-offs. In this case, sustainability burdens are also domestically internalized. A comparison of both cases can answer questions about institutional differences. Understanding the global shifts, entanglements, and sustainability trade-offs are inputs for policies mitigating spill-over effects.
Work packages
Work Package 1: Resource flows and trade-offs
This work package applies quantitative research methods to investigate the historical development of commodity flows and sustainability trade-offs. This part of the research will be conducted with Netherlands Statistics. Databases on material flows and sustainability developments in the entangled regions will be developed in consultation with CBS experts. As a ´researcher in residence´, the postdoc researcher will develop databases on Dutch global trade from 1900 to the present, and sustainability indicators in relation to regions of extraction and production of edible oils (WP2) and metals (WP3).
An in-depth analysis of trends in Dutch international trade will reveal the volume, rise, and decline of commodities. By adding regional data, this analysis can show the temporalities in regional shifts and interregional interdependencies. Together with the outcomes of WP2 and WP3, it will be possible to investigate substitutions and interrelated commodities. Sources for these investigations are, Dutch International Trade Statistics (since 1851), colonial statistical yearbooks as well as (inter)national agriculture (FAO) statistics (WP2), International iron & steel institute statistics, US Geological Surveys (WP3), yearbooks for individual countries, African National Development plans (since 1945) and Africa Sector Database (since 1960). Such information will help to create a database that informs WP2 and WP3 research, the synthesis, and is also a standalone WP1 deliverable, available for future consultation.
An assessment of sustainability developments will be based on sustainability monitors. The main applicant and other research team members have laid the foundations for this tool that is internationally acknowledged by the UN and OECD to visualize suitability developments (CES 2014; Schoenakers et al. 2015, Hoekstra 2019, CBS 2021). It uses historical data to construct time-series on economic, social, and human capital for the period 1900 until the present. Monitors will be constructed for selected years (1920, 1935, 1950, 1965, 1980, 2000, 2025) and regions of WP2 and WP3. Data since the 1960s can be found in official statistics published by the various UN agencies such as United Nations Comtrade database, 1962-2017, ILO (labor conditions), UNESCO (education) etc.
Work Package 2 – Protein and Edible oils
The WP1 research and WP2’s specific focus on edible oils can highlight the effect of global trade competition and the role of substitutes and global intra-regional competition. Furthermore, this case allows for a more in-depth analysis of cross-system dynamics. In time, the application of edible (plant) oils extended beyond the food industries into agricultural domains (animal fodder), the production of detergents and soaps, pharmacy, personal-care products, and biofuels.
Fats, protein, and carbohydrates contain major nutrients for humans and animals, and are sources of energy, essential vitamins, and other essential nutrients. These can be acquired by consuming fruit and vegetables, meat, and dairy products, however, in current diets, most are consumed in other products made of composite food. About 90 percent of the present fat intake comes from products such as margarine, baking fats and oils, or is based on imported resources such as palm, soy, sunflower, and other vegetable oils. Today, the Netherlands is Europe´s largest importer of palm oil (2.8 million tons). Commodification, rationalization, and specialization processes have made palm the major source of plant oils for the feed, food, cosmetics, and detergent industries. Animal husbandry demands made the Netherlands the world’s second largest importer of Soy, with imports of 6.6 million tons in 2018 (LNV, 2020). In December 2020, the Dutch ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality presented its National Protein Strategy to become less dependent on imports of protein-rich crops from outside the EU and increase European self-sufficiency in more ecologically friendly produced protein resources (LNV, 2020).
This work package engages with the tripartite aims of the STONEM project by studying the commodification of edible oils and establishment of global supply chains by Dutch global system entanglers. Dutch food industries, suppliers, and food authorities were the main contributors to knowledge about edible oils in the early twentieth century. They laid the foundations for research and development into the biochemical analyses of edible oils and fats and their characteristics. Food industries such as nut and oil traders, margarine producers such as Unilever (established in 1930) and its predecessors became major global system entanglers. They developed refined processing technologies and invested in plantations and transport facilities to gain access to resources in Global South regions. These ranged from palm plantations in Africa and Asia to later soy processing facilities in South America. The Netherlands developed an industrial complex in which tropical nuts, kernels, and fruits were processed into oils. Residual streams transferred into fodder were fed into compound feed manufacturer services for livestock farming. The second aim of work package 2 is to study the build-up of this transnational system by tracing the actors, the global system entanglers. Shedding light on this build-up are: Unilever and United Africa Company at Unilever Archives, Port Sunlight (UK), and Unilever Archives & Records Management (UARM) Rotterdam; N.V. Oliefabriek, formerly T. Crok Wormerveer (GA Zaanstad); Bedrijfschap voor Margarine Vetten en Oliën (NA).
There will be a specific focus on the difficulties, friction, and tension encountered in the establishment of these supply chains. Scrutinizing such encounters will shed light on processes of ecological, social, and cultural compression, alternatives, and the confrontation of western with indigenous sociotechnical systems (Ishikawa 2020; Robins 2021). These confrontations together with the WP1 monitor indicators will enable further investigation into the trade-offs with these socio-technical systems. Various commodities originated from different global regions and some commodities were substituted by others. Work Package 2 investigates not only these intra-regional but also temporal changes in trade-offs.
This work package attempts to understand why the Dutch acquired a leading position in the edible oil trade (Aftalion 2001, 84; Robins, 2021, 90-96), how this is linked to developing a social-technical system in support of this trade, and how shifts in commodity requirements changed this system in the past. Understanding the nature and implications of these shifts can inform policies for the contemporary protein transition (Hebinck, 2021).
Work Package 3: Ores and Metals
WP3 studies metal ores, and like WP2, focusses on the international impacts, and can furthermore highlight the shifting appreciation of metals as strategic resources for national economies and contemporary energy transitions policy. Similar to WP2, this work package will address the STONEM project’s tripartite aims of commodification, global supply chain development, and sustainability trade-offs.
This work package articulates various issues in the development of global supply chains. The Netherlands was less at the forefront of metals’ sociotechnical system than WP2 developments. The technological options of specific blast furnaces and smelters were also closely connected with requirements for feedstocks (Nijman 1994, Haumann 2020). In addition to the mining companies’ research institutes, (Dutch) investors and businesses, through their decisions, determined what became the crucial resources. Engineering journals and company archives can shed light on these decisions.
Because of its strong dependency on foreign resources, the establishment of global entangled sociotechnical systems connected to the Netherlands seemed more an extension of foreign activities, international and colonial mining companies established smelters and furnaces such as the zinc smelters in Budel and Arnhem (1890s) linked to the Billiton mining company’s activities in Indonesia. Alternative domestic strategic and economic considerations attracted investments in the IJmuiden blast furnaces (1910s), and aluminium smelters (1960s) in Vlissingen and Delfzijl. WP3 investigates the actors who entangled the Dutch sociotechnical system in zinc, iron, steel, and aluminium global supply chains. In WP3, post-World War II developments in Europe are important factors for understanding the changing structures in governance, institutions, and businesses and how these affected the shifts in global metal resources. Historical sources for these investigations are the Tata Steel archives, the Billiton archives, National Metals bureau (at National Archives), and the archives of transnational European institutions such as Eurofer and Institutes for the History of Aluminium (IHA). These developments entangled the Netherlands with (former) colonies Suriname, Indonesia, and other metal mining regions. The WP1 databases can indicate the regions’ shifts.
The impacts of these entanglements are assessed along with the WP1 indicators. This will answer questions on how Dutch metal consumption affected economic, social, and environmental capital in various mining regions across the globe. The sustainability trade-offs shown in WP3 were also felt in the Netherlands itself. Since their establishment, metal industries have challenged the social, economic, and environmental trade-offs domestically. WP3 therefore also investigates these domestic trade-offs as part of the global production systems.
Work Package 4: Synthesis and policy advice
Synthesis and policy advice will be executed by the project applicants and wider research team. Knowledge will be disseminated in a policy brief and an academic book issued by an international academic publisher. The policy brief will be presented at a workshop organized in conjunction with CBS. A draft version of the book will be discussed during a two-day international workshop with international academic an policy representatives in these fields (also see section B6).
Institutional setting and research team
The research of Sustainability Trade-offs in the Netherlands’ Entangled Modernisation (STONEM), 1900-2020 will take place at the Eindhoven University of Technology and Utrecht University. The wider research teams consist of experts from Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands Statistics (CBS), MetricsForTheFuture and the Foundation for the History of Technology (SHT).
Eindhoven University of Technology (TUe)
Scholars of the Technology Innovation an Society (TIS) group of the department Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences (IE&IS) will host one Postdoc (WP1) and one PhD candidate (WP2). The supervising teams consists of:
Prof. dr. Jan-Pieter Smits professor Quantification of Sustainability. His work focuses on the measurement and analysis of well-being and sustainable development. His expertise is in economic and social history. He is responsible for the development of new statistics and publications in the field of human well-being and sustainable development, for Netherlands Statistics (CBS) and international institutes. He is chief coordinator of the annual national CBS wellbeing and sustainability monitor and connected United Nations, World Bank and OECD projects (CES, 2014). In STONEM, he will be advisor to the WP1 Postdoc and promotor of the WP2 PhD candidate.
Dr. ir. Frank Veraart, assistant professor of history of technology and transition studies. He studies the sociotechnical changes in the Netherlands in the last two centuries. He has studied transitions in mobility, agriculture, and extraction of surface minerals. Frank is the project secretary of the STONEM project and coordinator of the TUe team of the Deep Transitions in the Netherlands project. Within STONEM Frank will be the daily supervisor of the PhD candidate of Protein and Edible oils.
Dr. Mila Davids is an assistant professor in history of technology and business history. She has a specific interest in the developments of international knowledge networks. She published on R&D activities, knowledge exchange in multinational company networks such as Unilever and Philips. In STONEM, she will be involved as team member in WP2 and WP3.
Prof. dr. ir. Harry Lintsen (em.), emeritus professor of history of technology. He has studied the history of technology in the Netherlands in the nineteenth and twentieth century. He was the project leader of the NWO project Historical Roots of the Dutch Sustainability Challenge and published on sustainability developments in the Netherlands and regional context.
Utrecht University (UU)
Scholars of the Utrecht University Centre for Global Challenges and Economic and Social History department are involved in the STONEM project. These research group have initiated many projects on business history. Currently this group coordinates international consortia studying Deep Transitions on global and national scales. This group will host one PhD researcher (WP3). The supervising team consists of
Prof. dr. Johan Schot (co-applicant) is professor of Global History and Sustainability Transitions at the Utrecht University Centre for Global Challenges. He chairs The Second Deep Transition in the Netherlands (DTNL) project. For these studies, he combines historical approaches with transition studies methods. In STONEM, he will be the promotor of the PhD candidate in WP3.
Dr. Bram Bouwens is a business historian and expert in histories of globalization (Bouwens et al. 2018a). He has also published on Dutch industries including Tata Steel (Bouwens et al. 2018b). For STONEM, he will supervise the PhD candidate in WP3.
Wageningen University and Research
The STONEM scholarly team is supplemented by scholars of Wageningen University and Research Knowledge, Technology and Innovation (KTI) Group a multidisciplinary group involved in science and technology studies from an historical and contemporary perspective. In STONEM knowledge and expertise about the protein and Dutch agriculture transitions will be provide by:
Dr. Barbara van Mierlo. Is associate professor working as a sociologist at the Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group of Wageningen University. Her expertise is in agri-food system transitions. She studies the processes of transformative, systemic change towards sustainability and their intersection with everyday social practices. She specifically focuses on the protein transition in agri-food systems. In STONEM, she will be an advisor and co-promotor of the WP2 PhD candidate.
Societal partners:
MetricsForTheFuture / Dr. Rutger Hoekstra
He is an expert on sustainability measurements systems. He co-chaired the UNECE/OECD/Eurostat Task Force which developed the Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations on Measuring Sustainable Development. He has worked with the United Nations, OECD, World Bank, European Commission, European Central Bank and other international organizations. He is also visiting is a visiting researcher at the Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML) at Leiden University. In STONEM, he will advise the postdoc researcher in WP1. The consultancy MetricsForTheFuture is a societal partner that contributes to the knowledge dissemination of STONEM results to wider international policy arenas.
Foundation for History of Technology
SHT (founded 1988) is a non-profit organization promoting the scholarly and public understanding of the interaction of technology and society. SHT hosts the secretariats of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT) and the research network Tensions of Europe. As societal partner, SHT is involved in knowledge dissemination and valorization activities in the realms of businesses and the wider public.
Netherlands Statistics / Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek
Netherlands Statistics department Labour, Environmental accounts, and Region is involved ion the STONEM project as societal partner, CBS provides tailored training and support in developing historical databases on Dutch foreign trade in commodities, and database indicators of foreign impact. This support is provided in a ´researcher in residence´ set-up. CBS is furthermore involved in the knowledge dissemination of STONEM results to Dutch ministries (EZK, BuZa, LNV, W&I) and other policy domains.
List of refences
Aftalion, F. (2001). A History of the International Chemical Industry, Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Press.
Beckert, S. (2014). Empire of Cotton, a Global History, New York: Vintage Books.
Bouwens, B. Donzé, P-Y. and Kurosawa, T. (eds.) (2018a). Industries and Global Competition, A history of Business Beyond Borders. Routledge. New York and London.
Bouwens, B., Dankers, J., van Mil, Y., Rutte, R., Sluyterman, K. & Verheul, J. (2018b). Driven by Steel – From Hoogovens to Tata Steel, 1918-2018. Bussum: TOTH.
Bridge G. (2009) Material worlds: natural resources, resource geography and the material economy. Geography Compass, 3 (3) (2009), pp. 1217-1244.
Caradonna, J. (ed.) (2018). Routledge Handbook of the History of Sustainability. New York: Routledge.
CBS (2021). Monitor Brede Welvaart & de SDG´s 2021. Den Haag/Heerlen/Bonaire: Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek.
CES (2014). Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations on Measuring Sustainable Development. Geneva/ New York: UNECE, United Nations.
Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., Steffen, W., Crumley, C., Dearing, J., Hibbard, K., Schimel,D. (2007). Sustainability or collapse: what can we learn from integrating the history of humans and the rest of nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment.36, 7, 522-527.
Dale, G. (2019). ´Sustaining What? scarcity and the natural order in the discourse on sustainability, 1650-1900´ in Jeremy L. Caradonna (ed.) Routledge Handbook of the History of Sustainability, Routledge, 71-95.
Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33 (6-7), pp. 897-920.
Haumann, S. (2020). Kalkstein als “Kritischer” Rohstoff, ein Stoffgeschiechte der Industrialisierung, 1840-1930. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Hazareesingh, S and Maat, H. (2016). Local Subversions of Colonial Cultures, Commodities and Anti-Commodities in Global History, Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
Hecht G. (2012). Being Nuclear, Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Hoekstra, R. (2019). Replacing GDP by 2030, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Hebinck, A., Klerkx, L., Elzen, B., Kok, K. P. W., König, B., Schiller, K., Tschersich, J., van Mierlo, B., & von Wirth, T. (2021). Beyond food for thought – Directing sustainability transitions research to address fundamental change in agri-food systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 81-85.
Heymann, M. et al. (2020). ‘Challenging Europe: technology, environment and the quest for resource security’, Technology and Culture, 61, 1, 282-294.
Homburg, E., Baggen, P. & Faber, J. (2010). ´The Rise of a Knowledge Society´ in Schot, J., Rip, A. & Lintsen, H. (eds.). Technology and the Making of the Netherlands: The Age of Contested Modernization, 1890-1970. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 252-323.
Homburg, E. (2018). Chemistry and Industry: A Tale of Two Moving Targets. Isis, 109(3), 565-576.
Iriye, A. (2013). Global and Transnational History: The Past, Present, and Future. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Ishikawa, N. (2020). ´Into a New Epoch: Capitalist Nature in the Plantationocene´, in N. Ishikawa and R. Soda (eds.) Anthropogenic Tropical Forest. Singapore: Springer. 589-595.
Kanger L. & Schot. J. (2019). Deep transitions: Theorizing the long-term patterns of socio-technical change, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 32, 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.006
Lafortune, G., Cortés Puch, M., Mosnier, A., Fuller, G., Diaz, M., Riccaboni, A., Kloke-Lesch, A., Zachariadis, T., Carli, E. Oger, A., (2021). Europe Sustainable Development Report 2021: Transforming the European Union to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. SDSN, SDSN Europe and IEEP. France: Paris. www.sdgindex.org/EU
Langenberg, H. & Smits, J-P. (2015). ´Invoer uit LDC’s: geworteld in koloniale tijden? Internationaliseringsmonitor, 2015-4. Den Haag/Heerlen/Bonaire: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
Lintsen, H., Veraart, F., Smits, J-P. & Grin, J. (2018). Well-being, Sustainability and Social Development: The Netherlands 1850-2050. Berlin: Springer.
LNV (2020). Nationale Eiwitstrategie. Publicatie-nr. 0920-020 (December 2020). Den Haag: Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.
Narins, T. (2017). The battery business: Lithium availability and the growth of the global electric car industry, The Extractive Industries and Society. 4,2, 321-328.
Nijman, D. (1994). Keuzen in de technische geschiedenis van Hoogovens, IJmuiden: Hoogovens.
Oorschot, M. van, et al. (2018). Transparantie verplicht. Verwachtingen over het instrument transparantie om maatschappelijk verantwoord ondernemen ter stimuleren, Den Haag: PBL.
Pirmana, V., Alisjahbana A., Arief Y., Hoekstra, R., Tukker, A. (2021). Environmental costs assessment for improved environmental-economic account for Indonesia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 1.
Robins, J. (2021). Oil Palm, a Global History. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press.
Saunier, P-Y. (2013). Transnational History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Schäfer, D. and Valeriani, S. (2021). Technology is Global, the Useful and Reliable Knowledge Debate. Technology and Culture. 62,2, 327-347.
Schoenaker, N., Hoekstra, R., and Smits, J. P. (2015). Comparison of Measurement Systems for Sustainable Development at the National Level. Sustainable Development, 23: 285– 300. doi: 10.1002/sd.1585.
Sluyterman K. (ed.) (2015). Varieties of Capitalism and Business History; The Dutch Case. New York: Routledge.
Trentmann, F. (2009). Crossing Divides: Consumption and globalization in history. Journal of Consumer Culture. 9, 2, 187-220.
Trischler, H. (2016). The Anthropocene: a challenge for the history of science, technology, and the environment, NTM International Journal of History & Ethics of Natural Sciences Technology & Medicine, 24 , 3, 309-335.
Topik, S. & Wells, A. (2014). Global Markets Transformed, 1870-1945, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Van Binsbergen, W. and Geschiere, P. (2005). Commodification: things, agency, and identities: (The social life of things revisited). Münster: LIT verlag.
Van der Vleuten, E. (2008). Toward a transnational history of technology: meanings, promises, pitfalls. Technology and Culture. 49. 4, 974-994.
Van der Vleuten, E. (2019a). Radical change and deep transitions: Lessons from Europe’s infrastructure transition 1815–2015, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22-32.
Van der Vleuten, E. (2019b). Technology, societal challenges, and global sustainability history. ICON, 24.34-52.
Van der Vleuten, E. (2020). History and technology in an age of “grand challenges”: raising questions. Technology and Culture, 61, 1, 260-271.
Van Rooij, A., Berkers, E., Davids, M., & Veraart, F. (2008). National innovation systems and international knowledge flows: an exploratory investigation with the case of the Netherlands, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20:2, 149-168.
Veraart, F., Åberg, A., Vikström, H. (2020a). Creating, capturing, and circulating commodities: The technology and politics of material resource flows, from the 19th century to the present. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7, 1, 1-7.
Veraart, F., Smits, J-P. & Van der Vleuten, E. (2020b). Connected by oil: A framework to analyze the connected sustainability histories of the Niger and Rhine Deltas, 1950-2015. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7, 1, 50-67.
Vikström, H. (2020). Risk or opportunity? The extractive industries’ response to critical metals in renewable energy technologies, 1980-2014. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7, 1, 20-28.
Wolters, L. (2020). Draft report with recommendations to the Commission on corporate due diligence and corporate accountability, 2020/2129(INL), Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament 2019-2024.
World Bank (2011). The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. Environment and Development. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2252
Zimmermann E. (1951) World Resources and Industries: a Functional Appraisal of the Availability of Agricultural and Industrial Materials (Rev. ed.), New York: Harper & Brothers.